Reasons NOT to tie teacher pay to student test scores
Gordon MacInnes of The Century Foundation has published this brief on the topic of using student test scores to measure teacher effectiveness, a proposition that has been advanced by a number of school reformers. This very controversial topic recently returned to news headlines after the New Haven (CT) teachers’ union signed a contract that includes student performance in the evaluation process tied to teacher salary.*
Among the reasons MacInnes gives for NOT using student test scores to ‘grade’ teacher performance:
- Students are not randomly assigned to teachers (nor to schools) – some teachers might only be assigned students perceived to be ‘good’ or ‘bad’
- Standardized tests are evaluated for reliability and validity based on their intended purpose, such as assessing 4th Grade math proficiency, not for evaluating teachers
- Compensating teachers according to individual performance might lessen the impetus for teachers to collaborate and share best practices
*See this New Haven Register (CT) article for more information on the contract signed by New Haven teachers.
[...] I’ve posted on this topic in the past. [...]
New research on teacher ‘pay for performance’ schemes « The Education Blog
November 11, 2009 at 7:51 pm